Reference
Where your numbers come from
Which numbers the platform reported, which Retensis calculated, and what is checked before an analysis reaches you.
Four data types
| Label | Meaning | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Measured | Read from a supported platform or stored observation | Views, comments, subscribers, experiment metrics, Instagram skip rate, average watch time and audience demographics |
| Predicted | Estimated by an AI model | Retention curve, virality, CTR tier, content brand-safety review |
| Grounded | Generated with external search or YouTube research context | Trends, gaps, plan sources |
| Deterministic | Recomputed by application logic | Opportunity weighting, comparison deltas, experiment winner, estimated revenue ranges, Instagram % watched and reach from non-followers |
Every metric says who produced it
The table above answers one question about a figure: what kind of output it is. This section answers a different one: where its value came from. Retensis records both, because knowing that a number was predicted does not tell you whose data it was predicted from.
Every metric Retensis publishes records where it came from: reported by the platform, calculated by Retensis, or read from a screenshot you supplied. The three are kept distinct and never averaged into one figure.
Wherever a calculated metric appears, it carries a note saying how it was worked out. You never have to guess whether a number came from the platform or from us, and you never have to take our arithmetic on trust.
That includes the readings that look wrong until somebody explains them. Your average watch percentage can go above 100%, because a replayed section is counted each time it is watched. It is a real reading of real behaviour, and we would rather explain it than quietly cap it at a rounder number.
Every analysis is checked before it reaches you
Every completed analysis passes automated quality checks before it is saved.
We compare against your real data
When your channel is connected, Retensis scores its own predictions against the retention the platform actually reported for that video. Not against an estimate, and not against a figure read off a screenshot.
It is also why a curve you import from a screenshot stays labelled as one everywhere it appears. It is worth showing you, and it is not the same kind of fact as a measurement the platform returned, so the two are never averaged into a single number.
Responsible use
- Treat predictions as hypotheses.
- Prefer repeated patterns over one isolated score.
- Use measured platform data to validate important decisions.
- Review grounding sources when recency matters.
- Keep brand, legal, medical, financial, and safety judgment with a qualified human.
Related documentation
Understanding analysis results
Read scores, retention, drop-offs, timelines, speech coaching, and the action plan correctly.
How we validate the moments Retensis flags
The test we run to check the moments behind drop-off analysis line up with the cuts in your edit, and the results it produced.
Prediction Accuracy
See how close our retention predictions land to your real audience data, and let Retensis calibrate future predictions to your channel.
Monetization
Estimate what your content type tends to earn, how ready you are for brand deals, and what to improve, grounded in your real channel numbers.